WEEK 6
BIOTECHNOLOGY + ART
![]() |
VectorPot. “Biotechnology Icon Set Vector Image on Vectorstock.” VectorStock, 25 May 2016, www.vectorstock.com/royalty-free-vector/biotechnology-icon-set-vector-8967444. |
This week’s reading covered many interesting topics having to do with the ideas of biotechnology in our society. It also served as a unique perspective on this often and “most controversial topic” of this course due to the artistic lens applied in our lectures and readings (Vesna).
While there were a variety of artistic pieces and topics discussed, the ideas surrounding the genetic engineering of DNA and animals was the topic I found to be most intriguing.
![]() |
“What Is Contemporary Art?” Escape Into Life, 2022, www.escapeintolife.com/essays/what-is-contemporary-art-mark-kerstetter/.
One of these projects that I found interest in was about “Alba” the fluorescent bunny. Alba was an albino (without pigment) bunny that was genetically modified with a GFP gene found in jellyfish (Philipkoski). When exposed to a UV light, this gene gives off a bright green glow, and as a result, Alba the bunny glowed green (Young).
![]() |
Staff, Noema, et al. “GFP Bunny.” NOEMA, 26 June 2012, noemalab.eu/ideas/gfp-bunny/. |
She was created by French artist Eduardo Kac, who took part in this project with the hopes of creating a buzzing discussion around the topics of family life and genetic modification (CABI). Kac’s work, despite the fact that it was and is still highly debated in its ethics, did serve a purpose in generating conversation surrounding the pros and cons of genetic modification. Ellen Levy in her writings provided this week also discusses this controversy and purpose behind biotech art.
In her writing, Defining Life: Artists Challenge Conventional Classifications, Levy offered the perspective of how artists approach these often very controversial topics surrounding genetic modified organisms, and the act of genetically modifying organisms for artistic purposes (Levy). Towards the end of her writing, one her quotes particularly caught my attention. Levy highlights why biotechnology and art is significant in a climate where it is often controversial — “such research is important, because biotechnology is a place where political, economic, legal, and scientific interests meet, and artists can promote discussion about these issues” (Levy). Levy’s perspective served as a way to tie these ideas and concepts we learned this week together.
Works Cited
CABI. “Glowing Rabbit Glows No More.” Glowing Rabbit Glows No More, CABI, 13 Aug. 2002, www.cabi.org/agbiotechnet/news/1628.
Levy, Ellen K. Defining Life: Artists Challenge Conventional Classification. 2022.
Philipkoski, Kristen. “RIP: Alba, The Glowing Bunny.” Wired, Conde Nast, 12 Aug. 2002, www.wired.com/2002/08/rip-alba-the-glowing-bunny/.
Vesna, Victoria. Biotech Intro New - Youtube. 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvp924_pbgc.
Young, Emma. “Mutant Bunny.” New Scientist, New Scientist, 22 Sept. 2000, www.newscientist.com/article/dn16-mutant-bunny/.



Hey Alex! I found your blog really interesting and well done this week. I think you did a great job discussing the controversiality of Biotechnology more specifically with Alba the bunny. I personally don't think it's necessary for scientists to turn a bunny neon, but I also think it's important to learn about what the effects of genetic modification are. Great Job!
ReplyDelete